Two-thirds of fertility patients feel ripped off by IVF clinics
Ewa Zotow, Progress Educational Trust
17 December 2018

[BioNews, London]

Sixty-two percent of private IVF patients paid 'more than they expected' for treatment, according to the first national patient survey by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA).

The UK fertility regulator released annual statistics showing that 60 percent of IVF cycles are now privately funded and that 74 percent of patients over the past two years paid for one or more 'add-on' treatments, up from 66 percent in the previous two years.

'Patients often feel pressure to opt for add-ons and many are understandably keen to explore every option to improve their chances of having a baby, but such treatments should only be offered where there is proof they work' said the HFEA's Chair, Sally Cheshire.

Add-ons can vary from so-called 'embryo glue', or scratching the uterine lining to encourage implantation, to alternative therapies such as acupuncture.

Over 1000 patients were surveyed across the UK and including those whose treatment was NHS funded, and those paying privately. 

The proportion of privately-funded cycles is rising as Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) cut funding for IVF on the NHS. Only 11 percent of CCGs now offer the three cycles recommended by NICE (the figure was 16 percent a year ago).

Overall, 75 percent of patients said they were satisfied with their treatment, meaning one quarter felt they had had an unsatisfactory treatment experience. These figures were similar whether treatment was NHS-funded or when the patients themselves were paying. 

IVF 'trap' anger: two in three IVF patients feel they are being ripped off by private fertility clinics
The Sun |  14 December 2018
New data reveals the UK fertility sector is performing well, and most patients are satisfied
HFEA |  14 December 2018
The State of the Fertility Sector (2017-2018)
HFEA |  14 December 2018
Two in three IVF patients feel ripped off by clinics, watchdog warns
The Telegraph |  13 December 2018
[email protected]
© Copyright 2008 Progress Educational Trust

Reproduced from BioNews with permission, a web- and email-based source of news, information and comment on assisted reproduction and human genetics, published by Progress Educational Trust.

Thank you for visiting